Clinical UM Guideline

Subject:Transcatheter Uterine Artery Embolization
Guideline #:  CG-SURG-28Current Effective Date:  01/01/2014
Status:RevisedLast Review Date:  11/14/2013


Transcatheter uterine artery embolization is a pelvic angiographic procedure used to decrease the symptoms of heavy bleeding and pelvic pain associated with fibroid tumors. Using hemostatic particles, selected vasculature providing the blood supply to the fibroids are occluded. When the blood supply is occluded, the fibroids decrease in size which reduces the symptoms.

Transcatheter uterine artery embolization has also been used for treatment of other acute pelvic hemorrhagic conditions such as uterine hemorrhage and ectopic pregnancy. Transcatheter uterine artery embolization is a technique performed by an interventional radiologist.

Note: Please see the following related document for additional information:

Clinical Indications

Medically Necessary: 

Transcatheter uterine artery embolization is considered medically necessary as a treatment of uterine fibroids when one of the following criteria is met:

Transcatheter uterine artery embolization is considered medically necessary in certain situations as a technique to control acute pelvic hemorrhagic conditions from something other than uterine fibroids, such as obstetric hemorrhage or ectopic pregnancy. 

Not Medically Necessary:  

Transcatheter uterine artery embolization is considered not medically necessary when a criterion above has not been met.

Repeat transcatheter embolization of uterine arteries to treat persistent symptoms of uterine fibroids after an initial uterine artery embolization is considered not medically necessary.


The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes.  Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy.  Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.

37243Vascular embolization or occlusion, inclusive of all radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural roadmapping, and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention; for tumors, organ ischemia, or infarction
37244Vascular embolization or occlusion, inclusive of all radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural roadmapping, and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention; for arterial or venous hemorrhage or lymphatic extravasation
ICD-9 Procedure[For dates of service prior to 10/01/2014]
68.24Uterine artery embolization [UAE] with coils
68.25Uterine artery embolization [UAE] without coils
ICD-9 Diagnosis[For dates of service prior to 10/01/2014]
218.0-218.9Uterine leiomyoma (fibroids)
626.8Dysfunctional or functional uterine hemorrhage
633.00-633.91Ectopic pregnancy
634.10-634.12Spontaneous abortion complicated by delayed or excessive hemorrhage
635.10-635.12Induced abortion, complicated by delayed or excessive hemorrhage
636.10-636.12Induced abortion, complicated by delayed or excessive hemorrhage
637.10-637.12Induced abortion, complicated by delayed or excessive hemorrhage
638.1Failed attempted abortion, complicated by delayed or excessive hemorrhage
639.1Complications following abortion and ectopic and molar pregnancies, delayed or excessive hemorrhage
ICD-10 Procedure[For dates of service on or after 10/01/2014]
04LE3DTOcclusion of right uterine artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach
04LE3ZTOcclusion of right uterine artery, percutaneous approach
04LF3DUOcclusion of left uterine artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach
04LF3ZUOcclusion of left uterine artery, percutaneous approach
ICD-10 Diagnosis[For dates of service on or after 10/01/2014]
D25.0-D25.9Leiomyoma of uterus (fibroids)
N92.0-N92.6Excessive, frequent and irregular menstruation
O00.0-O00.9Ectopic pregnancy
O03.6Delayed or excessive hemorrhage following complete or unspecified abortion
O04.6Delayed or excessive hemorrhage following (induced) termination of pregnancy
O07.1Delayed or excessive hemorrhage following failed attempted termination of pregnancy
O08.1Delayed or excessive hemorrhage following ectopic and molar pregnancy
Discussion/General Information

Transcatheter UAE is a technique that deprives blood flow to fibroids that are present in the uterus. Denying the blood supply to these areas or tissues will cause them to shrink and disintegrate. UAE involves inserting a small plastic tube into the arterial blood vessels leading to target lesions and then blocking the blood supply (a process called embolization) with one of several substances. The blockage of blood supply results in atrophy and death of the target tissue (fibroid) over a period of weeks or months. UAE has been reported to have a success rate of 81-100% (American College of Radiology, 2012).

A study by Moss and colleagues (2011) reported on a randomized comparison of UAE to surgical treatment in individuals with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST trial). A total of 157 women were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either UAE (n=106) or surgery (n=51). Quality of life was assessed at 5 years using a Short Form General Health Survey. The participants were followed at 12 months and no differences in quality of life gain were found between the UAE and the surgery group. At 5 years a total of 138/157 women were available for follow-up and no significant differences were noted between the 2 groups in the 8 components of the survey. Satisfaction level at 5 years was also similar between the 2 groups and remained high at 90% in the UAE group and 87% in the surgery group. The re-intervention rate was higher at 32% in the UAE group as compared to 4% in the surgical group and the overall group size was decreased from 200 to 157 due to difficulty in recruitment.

Toor and colleagues (2012) completed a meta-analysis of the complication rates of UAE, adverse events, reintervention and clinical improvement of UAE for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids. Fifty-four studies were analyzed (8159 women). There were 7 randomized, controlled trials comparing UAE to an alternative therapy, 37 prospective observational studies, and 10 retrospective observational series. None of the included women received UAE for adenomyosis only. Follow-up ranged from 3-60 months. No deaths as a result of UAE were reported. A total of 270 women experienced a major complication (2.9%). The passage of fibroid tissue was the most common reported adverse event following UAE (326/6858 women [4.7%]). Hysterectomy occurred in 26/4903 women (0.7%). Forty-two of the studies provided reintervention data (from 4682 women). Reinterventions included 81 repeat UAE, 81 myomectomies, and 257 hysterectomies. Thirty of the studies (2,930 women) provided clinical symptom improvement data. Clinical follow-up ranged from 0.25 to 2 years. Rates of symptomatic improvement ranged from 77.5% to 90.1% (95% confidence interval).

Another meta-analysis by Martin (2013) reported on the use, efficacy, and complications of UAE for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids compared to surgery. Eight randomized, controlled trials were reviewed (350 cases of UAE and 346 cases of surgery). For those women who had UAE the most common complications were bilateral UAE failure, discharge and fever, and postembolization syndrome. Of the women who had surgery, the most common complications were urinary stress incontinence, pressure symptoms, and menorrhagia. A total of 76 non-randomized studies were reviewed (11,195 cases of UAE). The most common complications were amenorrhea, pain, and discharge and fever. The total rate of complication was 24.86%. Forty-one case studies were reviewed (83 cases of UAE) which showed the most common complications were discharge and fever, fibroid expulsion, and fibroid amenorrhea. The total rate of complications was 0.550%. The authors note that the data must be interpreted with caution as the sample sizes were fairly limited and success rates and complication rates of UAE are related to operator experience, so in a large trial with many operators, the efficacy and complication rate may be worse than in studies where a single or few operators performed the procedure. Much of the reviewed literature did not publish the rates of reintervention. The benefits of UAE (minimally invasive procedure) should be weighed against increased reintervention rates.

Based on evaluation of the existing peer-reviewed medical literature, there is adequate evidence to support the use of UAE for the treatment of acute pelvic and obstetric hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy, and symptomatic uterine fibroids. For the treatment of pelvic and obstetric hemorrhage, UAE has been shown to be a safe and effective method to control bleeding when compared to alternative methods such as surgical intervention. For ectopic pregnancy, it has been illustrated that UAE is a safe and effective adjunct to methotrexate treatment, decreasing the need for surgical interventions following commonly unsuccessful drug-only treatment methods.

The presence of pedunculated fibroids has been considered a contraindication for UAE due to the fact if a pedunculated fibroid becomes septic after embolization, a hysterectomy is needed. Review of the peer-reviewed literature is now showing UAE for pedunculated fibroids may be safer than previously thought. Katsumori et al (2005) reported on a retrospective study of 196 women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who were treated with UAE. Twelve of the 196 women were found to have pedunculated subserosal uterine fibroids (a total of 15 tumors). The follow-up period was 5 to 51 months. During follow-up, no major complications were reported; nor were any minor complications noted. One week following UAE, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed complete devascularization in 11/15 of the tumors. Subsequent MRI done at 4 months and 1 year following UAE showed no tumor regrowth. The study is limited by the short follow-up period, small sample size, and retrospective design. Another retrospective review by Smeets and colleagues (2009) reported on 716 women with symptomatic uterine fibroids treated with UAE. Twenty-nine women were noted to have pedunculated fibroids (a total of 31 fibroids). With a mean follow-up of 33 months, no early or late complications occurred. Four of the 29 women required hysterectomy following UAE due to persistent symptoms, but the pedunculated fibroids were not the dominant reason and were infarcted. Although the sample size of women is small, these studies suggest that women with symptomatic fibroids with a pedunculated subserosal fibroid may be safely treated with UAE.

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines for uterine artery fibroid embolization (2005) cite contraindications to embolization which include pregnancy, genitourinary infection and malignancy. Andrews and colleagues (2004) also cite contraindications for uterine artery embolization to include pregnancy, infection, malignancy, coagulopathy and prior pelvic irradiation.

An increase in uterine size due to fibroid volume is a consideration prior to UAE. A study by Choi (2013) evaluated the effectiveness, safety and complications of UAE in women with large uterine fibroids. A total of 323 women underwent UAE for symptomatic uterine fibroids. None of the women had adenomyosis. The women were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 63 women with a large tumor of at least 10cm in size or a uterine volume of at least 700cm. Group 2 (260 women) was the control group. The treatment group (group 1) showed a volume reduction of tumors to be 46.5% compared to 52% in group 2. The group 1 women had a percentage volume reduction of the uterus of 40.7% compared to 36.3% in group 2. There were no reported significant differences in satisfaction or the presence of procedure-related complications.

Other therapies for symptomatic uterine fibroids include hysterectomy, myomectomy, hormonal therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues and luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues, and endurance until menopause when fibroids often regress.

The current published literature does not support the use of UAE for adenomyosis. A review by Popovic (2011) reported on 15 studies in which 511 women received UAE for adenomyosis. And while 387 of the 511 women reported symptomatic relief, the authors of the review concluded "results presented in this review are promising, but are insufficient to establish embolization as a potential first-line treatment for adenomyosis." Larger, randomized trials are necessary to determine true value of UAE and outcomes need to be verified by long term studies. In 2012, the American College of Radiology revised its Appropriateness Criteria® for the Radiologic Management of Uterine Leiomyomas and concluded that "UAE has shown early success in controlling the symptoms of bleeding with adenomyosis." However, there is a recurrence rate of approximately 40%-50% at two years and the long-term durability of UAE is questionable.

A 2012 retrospective study by Smeets reported on 40 women with adenomyosis who were treated with UAE. Mean clinical follow-up was 65 months. During that time, 8 women required additional therapy due to insufficient symptom relief (7 hysterectomies and 1 repeat UAE). Follow-up consisted of the use of uterine fibroid symptom and quality of life questionnaires. Of the 33 women with preserved uterus available with the quality of life questionnaires, 29 had scores indicating they were asymptomatic and 4 women had scores indicating substantial clinical symptoms despite embolization. This study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective design.

The current literature does not support a repeat uterine artery embolization for treatment of persistent symptoms of uterine fibroids after an initial uterine artery embolization.


Adenomyosis: A benign uterine disease in which the endometrium invades the myometrium resulting in enlargement of the uterus, menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea.

Ectopic pregnancy: A pregnancy which occurs when a fertilized egg becomes implanted outside the uterus in locations such as the fallopian tubes, cervix, ovaries or in the pelvic or abdominal space.

Embolization: The insertion of a substance through a catheter into a blood vessel to prevent the flow of blood.

Myomectomy: Procedure in which uterine fibroids are surgically removed from the uterus.

Uterine fibroids: Common and benign (non-cancerous) tumors of the uterus (also known as leiomyomata).


Peer Reviewed Publications:

  1. Badawy SZ, Etman A, Singh M, et al. Uterine artery embolization: the role in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin Imaging. 2001; 25(4):288-295.
  2. Choi HJ, Jeon GS, Kim MD, et al. Is uterine artery embolization for patients with large myomas safe and effective? A retrospective comparative study in 323 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24(6):772-778.
  3. Goodwin SC, Bradley LD, Lipman JC, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: a multicenter comparative study. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(1):14-21.
  4. Goodwin SC, Spies JB Uterine fibroid embolization. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(7):690-697.
  5. Gun M, Mavrogiorgis M. Cervical ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 19(3):297-301.
  6. Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O, et al. A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study. Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12(5):1-248.
  7. Katsumori T, Akazawa K, Mihara T. Uterine artery embolization for pedunculated subserosal fibroids. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(2):399-402.
  8. Martin J, Bhanot K, Athreya S. Complications and reinterventions in uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a literature review and meta analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013; 36(2):395-402.
  9. McLucas B, Adler L. Uterine fibroid embolization compared with myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 74(3):297-299.
  10. Moss JG, Cooper KG, Khaund A, et al. Randomised comparison of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST trial): 5-year results. BJOG. 2011; 118(8):936-944.
  11. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P. Fibroid-related menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up. Radiology 2000; 215(2):428-431.
  12. Popovic M, Puchner S, Berzaczy D, et al. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22(7):901-909.
  13. Salazar GM, Petrozza JC, Walker TG. Transcatheter endovascular techniques for management of obstetrical and gynecologic emergencies. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 12(2):139-147.
  14. Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Boekkooi PF, et al. Long-term follow-up of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 35(4):815-819.
  15. Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Boekkooi PF, et al. Safety and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization in patients with pedunculated fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 20(9):1172-1175.
  16. Spies JB, Bradley LD, Guido R, et al. Outcomes from leiomyoma therapies: comparison with normal controls. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(3):641-652.
  17. Toor SS, Jaberi A, Macdonald DB, et al. Complication rates and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(5):1153-1163.
  18. van der Kooij SM, Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial. J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203(2):105.e1-13.
  19. Yousefi S, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, White AM, et al. Repeat uterine artery embolization: indications and technical findings. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17(12):1923-1929.

Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Practice Bulletin Number 96. Alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112(2 Pt 1):387–400. Reaffirmed 2012.
  2. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Available at: Accessed on September 27, 2013.
    • Radiologic Management of Uterine Leiomyomas (2012).
  3. Andrews RT, Spies JB, Sacks D, et al. Patient care and uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004; 15(2 Pt 1):115-120.
  4. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids assessment. TEC Assessment, 2002; 17(8).
  5. Gupta JK, Sinha AS, Lumsden MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (5):CD005073.
  6. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Interventional procedure guidance 367. Uterine artery embolisation for fibroids. November 2010. Available at: Accessed on September 27, 2013.
  7. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 89(3):305-318.
Embolization of Uterine Artery for Treatment of Fibroid Tumors
Fibroid Tumors, Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of
Uterine Artery Embolization for Treatment of Fibroid Tumors




Revised11/14/2013Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Removed list of contraindications from Not Medically Necessary statement and clarified Not Medically Necessary statement. Updated Discussion/General Information, Definitions, and References. Updated Coding section with 01/01/2014 CPT changes; removed CPT 37204, 37210 deleted 12/31/2013, and 75894 (no longer applicable).
Revised11/08/2012MPTAC review. Added adenomyosis to Not Medically Necessary Clinical Indications. Updated Discussion/General Information and References.
Reviewed02/16/2012MPTAC review. Updated Discussion/General Information, Definitions, and References.
 10/01/2011Updated Coding section with 10/01/2011 ICD-9 changes.
Reviewed02/17/2011MPTAC review. Updated References.
Reviewed02/25/2010MPTAC review. Discussion and References updated.
Reviewed02/26/2009MPTAC review. Place of Service removed. References updated.
Revised02/21/2008MPTAC review. Medically necessary criteria clarified. Discussion and References updated.  
 08/03/2007References updated.
New03/08/2007MPTAC review. Initial guideline development. SURG.00018 Transcatheter Uterine Artery Embolization transferred to CG-SURG- 28 Transcatheter Uterine Artery Embolization. References updated.